Back to Engine
2
Layer 2 of 7

Governance

Definitions, ownership, decision rights, and operational cadence. Without governance, each team operates with its own version of reality.

The silent problem that sabotages everything else

Governance is the most underestimated layer of the Engine and probably the most important. It’s not sexy. It doesn’t have brilliant dashboards or spectacular automations. But without it, everything else is built on sand.

The problem is subtle and that’s why it’s dangerous. When a sales director says “we’ve grown 15%” and the finance director says “we’ve grown 8%,” both can be right. They’re simply using different definitions. One counts confirmed orders. The other counts recognized revenue. Neither is lying. But the organization doesn’t have a single truth.

What Governance does

Governance establishes the rules of the operational game. It defines what each term means, who is responsible for each decision, how often each metric is reviewed, and how process changes are managed.

Data dictionary: Every metric, every entity, every indicator has a single approved definition. Occupancy rate, average ticket, cycle time, gross margin: each with a precise definition, a single source of calculation, and someone responsible for its integrity. When someone asks “what does this number mean,” the answer is documented and the same for everyone.

Ownership and decision rights: Every process has an owner. Every metric has a responsible party. Every exception has an escalation protocol. It’s not bureaucracy. It’s clarity. When a KPI deviates from target, knowing who needs to act and what authority they have to do so is the difference between a fast response and a two-hour coordination meeting.

Operational cadence: Weekly review meetings with automated dashboards, monthly trend reviews, quarterly operating model reviews. Each meeting with a defined agenda, automatically prepared data, and expected outputs. Operational meetings stop being data presentation sessions and become decision sessions.

Process catalog: Critical processes are documented, versioned, and accessible. Not in a 200-page document nobody reads, but in operational cards with the flow, responsibilities, SLAs, and known exceptions. When a new employee joins, they have a place to look up how things are done.

Why it matters

Without Governance, Visibility data isn’t comparable. Without Governance, Integration connections link data that means different things. Without Governance, Orchestration workflows execute processes that nobody has formally defined. Without Governance, Control KPIs measure things that each person interprets differently.

Governance is the invisible glue that makes all other layers work as a coherent system rather than a set of loose pieces.

Typical implementation

Governance is implemented in parallel with Visibility and is usually completed in 3-4 weeks. The Blueprint already identifies divergent definitions and ownership gaps. The Governance implementation resolves them one by one, with alignment workshops among stakeholders and progressive documentation.

The result is not a document that gets filed away. It’s a living dictionary that is consulted daily, updated when needs change, and automatically applied in the Engine’s dashboards and workflows.

Problems

What this layer solves

Each department defines the same metrics differently

Nobody knows who is responsible for what

Operational meetings lack reliable data

Processes exist in people's heads, not documented

Exceptions have become the norm without anyone deciding it

Stack

Technologies involved

Diccionario de datos gobernado Matrices RACI Cadencia operativa automatizada Catalogo de procesos Decision rights framework Gestion del cambio

Tell us about your tech challenge

30 minutes. No commitment. We diagnose your current situation and propose a concrete action plan.

Schedule a meeting